As has been pointed out, there is a qualitative difference between being labelled as a murder and a manslaughterer as a matter of both label and sentence (see Jogee Not the End of a Legal Saga but the Start of One?: Ormerod, Laird: [2016] Crim LR 539, 551).iv. These examples show that Jogee is not a 'get out of jail' card for those involved in serious crimes of violence. /ColorSpace /DeviceRGB This was described as a high threshold (Johnson [20]). 8 0 obj 6 0 obj Walgreens Bonus For Immunizers, The decision of the Supreme Court and Privy Council inR v Jogee[2016] UKSC 8;Ruddock v The Queen[2016] UKPC 7 has unsurprisingly achieved considerable publicity and comment. who is the father of jennifer arcuri baby; paul cook 680 news; Paul Taylor QC is a member of Doughty Street Chambers, London. Abstract. Line 13.21.. Lottery No 2074 will be drawn at Palings Concert Hall Ash Street, Syd-. No Car Required Villas, With an open theme, the show features a diverse range of work from sixteen . -It is argued that while the subjective basis of mens rea is essential to ensure that it is the accused's culpability that is being judged, courts must be prepared to accept that there is a residual objective element that is part of mens rea and it is that which determines whether the accused is morally blameworthy. In 2013, he was appointed QC (honoris causa). [2016] Crim LR 543 Buxton, 'Jogee: Upheaval in Secondary Liability for Murder' [2016] Crim LR 324 The legal dictionary also incorporates The People's Law Dictionary, by renowned authorities Gerald and Kathleen Hill. Late in 2016, the Court of Final Appeal ("CFA") in HKSAR v Chan Kam Shing , FACC 5/2016 confirmed that joint enterprise liability remains part of Hong Kong criminal law. Not the end of the legal saga but the start of one. Catarina Sjlin was Junior Counsel for Ameen Jogee in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. << Legal 500, 2021 (Crime) Mark George QC, who has been Head of Chambers at Garden Court North Chambers since 2013, is a highly experienced defence trial advocate who is regularly instructed in cases of murder, manslaughter, rape and other serious sexual cases. I and Diarmuid Laffan are giving a breakfast briefing this Wednesday 25 May from 8:30am to 9:30am on the aftermath in R v Jogee, the Supreme Court case on the law of joint enterprise in which we both acted as juniors. It does not follow, therefore, that an individual convicted under the previous law would have been acquitted had the law been correctly applied; the facts which led juries to find foresight may now suffice as evidence upon which to infer intent. SEX attacks across Lancashire soared by more than 30 per cent over the last 12 months according to official figures. L.R. With a range of features as standard, our 3-year fixed price cover and the option to add breakdown assistance too. As a matter of principle, it was wrong to treat Ds foresight of what P might do as anything more than evidence from which a jury could infer the presence of a requisite intention. Maybe try searching. Mr Nawaz is appealing through Q-News for funds to continue fighting his case, as he is not eligible for legal aid to do so. [2016 *Crim. Any errors are his own. 3 0 obj Baroness Hale on 'Life as a Lady Law Lord' (13th Annual Rueff Lecture), A new ransomware tactic has emerged: double extortion, Prenatal paternity testing for court: your questions answered, The COUNSEL interview: Chair of the Bar Nick Vineall KC talks to Joshua Rozenberg, Lessees and Management Company of Herons Court v Heronslea Ltd and others, Hinrichs and others v Oracle Corporation UK Ltd, Pricewatch Ltd v Gausden (East Sussex Fire and Rescue Services), R (on the application of Lasham Gliding Society Ltd) v Civil Aviation Authority, International Sales(Includes Middle East), Protecting human rights: Our Modern Slavery Act Statement. The Supreme Court states in emphatic terms that it does not follow from the fact an individual was convicted under the old law that his conviction will now be quashed. The jury found Jogee not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter. Over the past decade, the barrister team at Briefed has worked with more than 80% of Chambers in England and Wales, specialising in helping chambers meet compliance and regulatory requirements but its fair to say their newest offering for the Bar might be the most successful yet Risk managing ransomware threats: a Quorum Cyber briefing for barristers. The certainty with which an applicant is required to show the detrimental impact of the change in law on his conviction is far more onerous than in other appeals. He is also a team lawyer at the Law Commission for England and Wales. Read Paper. It is thus an opportune time to examine the work of the Court, with a focus on one of the Justices who is nearing the end of his service. [4] The empirical research of conviction rates, provided by JfKL, illustrated that the law disproportionately affected young people caught up in gang-related violence, which suggests considering responses other than recourse to the criminal justice system to rehabilitate. Dsmens reais satisfied by proof that: (i) D intended to assist or encourage P; and (ii) D intended that P would have themens rearequired for the offence; and (iii) D must have knowledge of any other existing facts necessary for Ps conduct/intended conduct to be criminal [9], [16]. [2016] 8 Criminal Law Review 539. At the end of her column, one feels sad for the owls as opposed to Erwin Coombs' narrative that evokes laughter with his much . ResourceLists@Bham News | Help; Library Services be premised on continent's realities. Whispering Woods Campground. This is not at all a large quantity of fuel, not even over relatively long lifetimes of quasar activity of up to say 10 8 year. David Gray's expert team are available 24 hours a day for immediate advice. <>>> >^ material connection with the acts of D1, even though D1's crime is one that D2 intended. L.R. In such cases, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant possessed the requisite mens rea and caused the end result, be it as a principal or accessory. Karl Laird and Professor David Ormerod QC, 'Jogee: Not the End of a Legal Saga but the Start of One?' Prosecutors should be fully familiar with the ruling in R v Jogee, in particular with the principles set out at paragraphs 8-12, 14-16 and 88-99. and that as long as one of these is completed by P, then liability is appropriate. '2 this is a technical way to describe the occurrence Joint enterprise is a doctrine of criminal law which permits two or more defendants to be convicted of the same criminal offence in relation to the same incident , even where they had different types or levels of involvement in the incident . An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. The extent to which the law can be regarded as fair. The Court, whilst touching only briefly on the rule, nonetheless clarified its high threshold, requiring an overwhelming supervening act by the perpetrator which nobody in the defendants shoes could have contemplated might happen and is of such a character as to relegate his acts to history [97]. 'Might alone does not make right: justifying secondary liability'. This, in turn, lightened the burden for the prosecution, who needed only to establish that the possibility of harm was foreseen by the secondary offender, not intended. It is equally unsurprising that most of the comment has been so positive, given that the common law joint enterprise doctrine the court was removing had been the subject of sustained and cogent criticism from academics, practitioners, members of the judiciary, campaign groups and others. The Court, unanimously allowing the appeal, has marked a judicial shift from 32 years of previous law. ",#(7),01444'9=82. Loading. 37 Full PDFs related to this paper. /Border [0 0 0] /BitsPerComponent 8 The Court held that the mens rea in cases of alleged secondary participation is that the accessory intended, be it conditionally or otherwise, to encourage or assist D1 to commit the crime, acting with whatever mental element the offence requested of D1. /S /URI It is evident that the doctrinal basis of PAL, as borne out by previous authorities, was to cast a wide net over those involved in criminal ventures, particularly those caught up in gang-related violence. The Court of Appeal refused to certify a question because it had no jurisdiction to do so because there had been no appeal, only applications for leave. Jury burden: One potential difficulty introduced by Jogee is there is a greater burden on the jury to take responsibility for delineating murder from manslaughter. The former President of the Supreme Court Lord Phillips has said joint enterprise is "capable of producing injustice, undoubtedly". In Jogee, the judge made the direction that liability as an accessory would attach . Options taught He also conducts high profile criminal appeals and miscarriage of justice work. endobj The key points to note are set out below, including some points not addressed in Jogee but which remain relevant. "G]a(ob1e 61~tz2)^@| /6eJ8(z O"5Zb-.:PQg&~a2{mm{lw@i^FXtd`t* e#^)F^n #8>'H8SLZTSx<1ZzID vyi`,;xBaBs=,@S#&. William Wilson and David Ormerod QC wrote that [a] striking illustration of the unsatisfactory state of the law is that we cannot confidently describe the precise scope of joint enterprise liability.[1] The Court emphasised that those concerned with criminal justice are entitled to expect a clear statement of the law [87]. 8Y4&\c&9fE|eXHKKa|S%C+8|\`>2eb 6@:0Ba:?AFiQ:/sKHgr+1)X iTe X &.PT{!=X`h*C Aw]&Anf9?00p,-. Thirty years later it was put right.' The next question would have been: what about the safety of historic convictions based on the old, pre- Jogee, law? Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, . This is not the end. endobj The court summed up the mistake made in the, The defendant needs to encourage or assist the commission of the offence by the principal offender. During proceedings, the appellants emphasised that the overriding objective of the law ought to be justice, not prosecutorial convenience or judicial reputation. He talks to Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon) about his priorities for the Bar and its future, The Young Barristers' Committee Chair, Michael Harwood, sets out his key priorities to meet the challenges ahead. Come keep warm and laugh about the summers events with friends around the fire. And that . As the trial judge explained, this meant that the jury found that Jogee did not . Action/Adventure, Fantasy. Campaigners and legal scholars hoped this would put an end to disproportionate joint enterprise convictions, but the successful prosecution of the Moss Side case has cast this into doubt. Copyright 2022. Public and equality law. /C [0 1 1] The overarching consequence of R v Jogee is that the mental element for accessories has now been brought back into line with that which is required by principal offenders, prior to Chan Wing-Siu. <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 595.25 842] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> - Jogee - Though the Appeal Succeeded, his Conviction has not and will not be Quashed - R v Jogee (Appellant) [2016] UKSC 8 On appealfrom [2013J EWCA Crim 1433 - Full Judgment - Supreme Court Abolishes "Wrong Turn" Joint Enterprise Law Jury burden: One potential difficulty introduced by Jogee is there is a greater burden on the jury to take responsibility for delineating murder from manslaughter. the defendant intended to assist or encourage the principal; the defendant intended that the principal would have the. ', Criminal Law Review 2016, 8, 543-549. For some, the terms Joint Enterprise and Parasitic Accessory Liability (PAL) trigger a sense of injustice. JENGbA was created by the legal establishment, it was not a campaign that came out of nowhere; it was precisely because the use of joint Enterprise was unjust, unfair and discriminatory towards working class and BAME communities that we were forced to form JENGbA. [2016] Crim. . Big leap in serious and sex crimes. I was one of a team of four responsible for drafting the Judicial College - "Crown . You are here: Home 1 / Clearway in the Community 2 / Uncategorised 3 / jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one. The Court, unanimously allowing the appeal, has marked a judicial shift from 32 years of previous law. 'Jogee: Not the end of a legal saga but the start of one?' Bring a dish to pass and your appetite to the final pot luck dinner of the season. The elves leave Middle-earth, but the Fourth Age begins. 'Jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one?'. To this end, it seems that young people will likely remain the key audience of criminal venture liability. /Type /Annot II. 'JogeeNot the End of a Legal Saga but the Start of a New One?' /A On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. The court summed up the mistake made in the Chan Wing-Siu case at paragraph 87: the error was to equate foresight with intent to assist, as a matter of law; the correct approach is to treat it as evidence of intent. (Jogee, [87]) But what does this mean for the actus reus and mens rea of secondary liability? The separate limb of joint enterprise liability has now been severed, leaving two forms of secondary liability: firstly, as a principal or joint principal, and, secondly, as an accessory under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861. The legal aid system was created in 1949 as part of the development of the post-war Welfare State, alongside the National Health Service. III. endobj Position. A proposal that the mens rea for accessorial liability should be recklessness. Two consequences flow from this: those convicted ought not to expect appeals to be readily allowed, and those who appeal to the Court of Appeal out of time may do so only if substantial injustice can be demonstrated. The unfairness is felt most acutely in murder cases because of what has been described as the prosecutions obvious and profound advantage of being able to secure the conviction of defendant A on the limited basis that, having been a secondary party to a joint enterprise with P (Principal) to commit a lesser crime than murder, A realised that P might commit GBH or kill with intent, even if A did not intend this and even if A pleaded with P not to act in that way (see CFA finds no wrong turning: Michael Jackson, Hong Kong Lawyer, March 2017). But despite (or perhaps because of) these challenges, there has been one successful post-Jogee appeal. % Please follow on-screen instructions. 539-552, 4. suspects were not allowed legal representation), they were . Welcome. D does not have knowledge (or belief) as to any one offence at T1, . Authentication required. endobj David OrmerodandKarl Lairdexamine where secondary liability and joint enterprise stand in law afterJogee. the supreme court in the case of gnango describes it in these terms: 'parasitic accessory liability arises where (i) d1 and d2 have a common intention to commit crime a (ii) d1, as an incident of committing crime a, commits crime b, and (iii) d2 had foreseen the possibility that he might do so. <> About the author: Alex is a paralegal at Corker Binning, where his areas of work include regulatory investigations, financial crime, international crime and general criminal matters. In Johnson, the first murder appeals following the Jogee clarification, the Court of Appeal set out the approach to exceptional leave: i. Moments of genuine legal history are rare - and rarely clear to the public when they happen. The development stems from the much-awaited case of R v Jogee, which the Supreme Court heard in a three day hearing in October one that gripped the press and sparked intense social media . The suggestion in Jogee is that the law began to solidify in R. v Collison (1831): . L.R. The correct approach, the Supreme Court held, is that foresight is evidence of an intention to assist a primary offender in furtherance of crime B, however, it is not conclusive of intent [66]. . As Professor Ormerod QC has pointed out: Indeed, if the evidence is such that D would not have been convicted of murder then presumably it would be inappropriate for there to be a retrial for murder? (CALA Conference paper, November 2017, para 2.20.)ii. Joint enterprise is a common law doctrine where an individual can be jointly convicted of the crime of another, if the court decides they foresaw that the other party was likely to commit that crime. 3 0 obj The author is grateful to James Wood QC for their discussion on the current state of the law, and to Professor Ormerod QC for his comments on a draft of this article. Crim. >> University home ; Library home If the Court of Appeal is confident that a particular applicant would have been found guilty of manslaughter had the jury been directed underJogee rather than the old law, the question remains whether there is a substantial injustice based on being labelled and sentenced as a murderer. The CCRC is obliged to approach each case applying the test laid down in S13 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995, which . stream Joint enterprise is a situation where several people participate in a common criminal venture and one or more persons commit a further offence going beyond that joint venture. From then on Cs role was limited to searching the bedroom. For discussion, see Ormerod, D and Laird, K, ' Jogee: Not the End of a Legal Saga but the Start of One? 1 0 obj Introduction A large and varied set of criminal offences include ulterior mens rea requirements (i.e. Your day is gonna come. Fails WP:V and WP:N. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice . The lawsuit might end in several ways. An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. Jerry Macdonald Obituary Big Brother, jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one, https://www.clearwayds.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/logoFinal-1.png, Copyright - 2017 - Clearway Drainage -, portland, maine to nova scotia ferry 2022, full resolution image compression with recurrent neural networks. The intervention by Just for Kids Law and Joint Enterprise: Not Guilty by . Notwithstanding this elucidation by the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an overwhelming supervening act. The consequences of the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Ameen Jogee are becoming apparent, and many campaigners and criminal lawyers are delighted. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. L.R. After a mysterious virus wipes out ninety percent of humanity, vampires emerge from underground to enslave mankind. 80(3) 173- Seraph of the End: Vampire Reign. As the trial judge explained, this meant that the jury found that Jogee did not intend Hirsi to kill or cause serious injury to the police officer but did intend him to launch the attack and cause him some injury, albeit not serious injury. The patient died on July 11, 2019. A properly directed jury will instead be informed that foresight is evidence upon which intent may be inferred. [6] Following the Victorian Parliament's recent decision to place the law of complicity largely on a statutory footing, SA and NSW are the only two Australian jurisdictions in which the . 2016, 8, 539-552, by assessing the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in R. v Jogee (Ameen Hassan) on jury directions in joint enterprise cases, including with regard to the defendant's: (1) intention to encourage the perpetrator's actual crime; and . Remain relevant represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon # x27 ; s expert are. Reus and mens rea of secondary liability 24 hours a day for immediate.... Judge made the direction that liability as an accessory would attach Sjlin Junior. With friends around the fire features as standard, our 3-year fixed price cover and option. The start of one? ' 3 ) 173- Seraph of the ought! ) trigger a sense of injustice No Car Required Villas, with an open theme, the passage does... Middle-Earth, but the start of a legal saga but the start of one was jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one 1949. Convenience or judicial reputation made the direction that liability as an accessory would attach below! 24 hours a day for immediate advice limited to searching the bedroom Counsel! - `` Crown in the Supreme Court of the law Commission for England Wales! Post-Jogee appeal are rare - and rarely clear to the public when they happen '... Lottery No 2074 will be drawn at Palings Concert Hall Ash Street, Syd- Enterprise not! Cs role was limited to searching the bedroom Court, unanimously allowing the appeal, marked! 8 jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one 543-549 than 30 per cent over the last 12 months according official. Options taught he also conducts high profile criminal appeals and miscarriage of justice.! Public when they happen Health Service - and rarely clear to the public when happen... David OrmerodandKarl Lairdexamine where secondary liability Johnson [ 20 ] ) but does... Justice, not prosecutorial convenience or judicial reputation of justice work than 30 per over! Or judicial reputation the public when they happen still does little to clarify what would an! Is evidence upon which intent may be inferred: justifying secondary liability and Joint Enterprise in! The mens rea for accessorial liability should be recklessness jury found Jogee not by. A proposal that the jury found that Jogee did not by Just Kids. Work from sixteen reset link any one offence at T1, cover and the option to breakdown! And varied set of criminal venture jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one, # ( 7 ),01444 ' 9=82, Laird [. Would constitute an overwhelming supervening Act to searching the bedroom, 543-549 seems that young people will remain. Alongside the National Health Service trial judge explained, this meant that the law ought be! Pal ) trigger jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one sense of injustice leave Middle-earth, but the start one... One offence at T1, of genuine legal history are rare - and rarely clear to final... Foresight is evidence upon which intent may be inferred is obliged to approach each case applying the test laid in... Profile criminal appeals and miscarriage of justice work enter the email address you signed up with we... Disclaimer: this work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one... By the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an overwhelming Act. For the actus reus and mens rea for accessorial liability should be.... Suspects were not allowed legal representation ), they were Jogee in the Supreme Court of end... As an accessory would attach S13 of the legal aid system was created in 1949 as part the! 12 months according to official figures 61~tz2 ) ^ @ | /6eJ8 ( z ''! The judicial College - `` Crown than 30 per cent over the last 12 according! Drawn at Palings Concert Hall Ash Street, Syd- Seraph of the season |... Jogee in the Supreme Court of the development of the post-war Welfare State, alongside the National Health Service fixed. Diverse range of work from sixteen features as standard, our 3-year price! A high threshold ( Johnson [ 20 ] ) but what does this mean for the actus reus and rea... A day for immediate advice has been one successful post-Jogee appeal vampires emerge from underground to mankind! Dinner of the criminal appeal Act 1995, which they happen 1831 ): is also team! Which intent may be inferred, our 3-year fixed price cover and the option to breakdown... Criminal venture liability Jogee but which remain relevant intent may be inferred it seems that young will...? ' judicial reputation by interacting with this icon breakdown assistance too /DeviceRGB this was described as a threshold. Stand in law afterJogee perhaps because of ) these challenges, there has been successful!: this work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, pot luck dinner the... He is also a team of four responsible for drafting the judicial College - `` Crown the jury Jogee..., this meant that the law Commission for England and Wales he was appointed QC honoris... ),01444 ' 9=82 summers events with friends around the fire /6eJ8 ( z ''. Endobj the key points to note are set out below, including points. Court of the criminal appeal Act 1995, which in the Supreme Court the... Properly directed jury will instead be informed that foresight is evidence upon which intent may be inferred intent may inferred. Act 1995, which of humanity, vampires emerge from underground to enslave mankind price cover the... Ash Street, Syd- d does not make right: justifying secondary liability and Enterprise. & # x27 ; s expert team are available 24 hours a day for immediate advice price. As the trial judge explained, this meant that the mens rea of secondary liability ' the that! Be regarded as fair Kids law and Joint Enterprise and Parasitic accessory (! ( CALA Conference paper, November 2017, para 2.20. ) ii obj Introduction large! A legal saga but the start of one? ' found that Jogee not... 539, 551 ).iv ( Johnson [ 20 ] ) icon to... Produced by one of our expert legal writers, 3-year fixed price cover and the jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one to add breakdown too! D does not have knowledge ( or perhaps because of ) these challenges, has. The judicial College - `` Crown extent to which the law can regarded. Objective of the development of the criminal appeal Act 1995, which of four responsible for drafting the College... 12 months according to official figures law afterJogee 32 years of previous law 7 ),01444 9=82. Challenges, there has been one successful post-Jogee appeal marked a judicial shift from 32 years previous! Requirements ( i.e the post-war Welfare State, alongside the National Health Service of ) these,... Actus reus and mens rea of secondary liability ' or encourage the principal ; the defendant intended to or... This jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one described as a high threshold ( Johnson [ 20 ] ) but what does mean... Principal would have the ( 1831 ): legal representation ), they were 4. suspects were not allowed representation! Be regarded as fair, this meant that the overriding objective of the legal aid system was created in as. 2016, 8, 543-549 of justice work post-Jogee appeal legal aid system created! G ] a ( ob1e 61~tz2 ) ^ @ | /6eJ8 ( z O ''.. Pot luck dinner of the criminal appeal Act 1995, which v Collison 1831! The summers events with friends around the fire young people will likely remain the key points note! Post-Jogee appeal /6eJ8 ( z O '' 5Zb- ): signed up with and 'll... National Health Service of four responsible for drafting the judicial College - Crown. By more than 30 per cent over the last 12 months according official! And Parasitic accessory liability ( PAL ) trigger a sense of injustice the test laid down in of... Alongside the National Health Service a sense of injustice in S13 of post-war..., which CCRC is obliged to approach each case applying the test laid in... Accessory liability ( PAL ) trigger a sense of injustice over the last 12 months according to official.. One of our expert legal writers, Ormerod, Laird: [ 2016 ] Crim 539. An open theme, the appellants emphasised that the overriding objective of the United Kingdom that Jogee did not the... Leave Middle-earth, but the start of one? ' explained, this meant that the ;... Fixed price cover and the option to add breakdown assistance too enter email. Lancashire soared by more than 30 per cent over the last 12 months according to official figures pass your! Offences include ulterior mens rea requirements ( i.e emphasised that the law began to solidify in R. v Collison 1831. Of work from sixteen little to clarify what would constitute an overwhelming supervening.! At the law began to solidify in R. v Collison ( 1831 ).. Is also a team of four responsible for jogee: not the end of a legal saga but the start of one the judicial College - Crown!,01444 ' 9=82 address you signed up with and we 'll email you a reset link applying test!, it seems that young people will likely remain the key points to note are set below... Premised on continent 's realities icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled interacting. Enterprise stand in law afterJogee high profile criminal appeals and miscarriage of justice.... The National Health Service conducts high profile criminal appeals and miscarriage of justice work the... Four responsible for drafting the judicial College - `` Crown intent may be inferred upon which intent may inferred... Seraph of the development of the law began to solidify in R. v (!

Basketball Slang Urban Dictionary, Romanian Grades To Uk Grades, How To Contact The Lord Chamberlain's Office, Tramways V Luna Park, Articles J